WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "8968fab4-b587-4ad9-8284-5d968f7ab561"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "3497", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "3497"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:toyama.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003497", "sets": ["564"]}, "author_link": ["53414", "53415"], "item_3_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他(別言語等)のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "On Some Doubts of the Fundamental of Magnetism"}]}, "item_3_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1953-03-05", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1/2", "bibliographicPageEnd": "8", "bibliographicPageStart": "1", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "4", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "富山大学工学部紀要"}]}]}, "item_3_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "There were a few change in the lecture of the fundamental of electricity and magnetism.\nIt was the adoption of the MKS rational system for the units of the electric and magnetic quantities, and of the charge of electricity Q as a dimension for them. I have had a dissatisfaction in the fundamental of the theory of magnetism for long time. But no improvements were not seen in this field.\nMy opinion is as follows.\nThe idea of magnetic charge must be used carefully as the magnetic charge is apparent and not being as the electric charge.\nThere are mistakes in the calculation of the magnetic potential differences of two points near the surface of a magnetic shell, one is at positive side and the another at negative side, in usual text books.\nMy definition of magnetic induction and magnetic force is stated.\nThe Ampere\u0027s law is experimental and can not be proved theoretically.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}, {"subitem_description": "私が初めて電気磁気学を学んでから既に三十余年,この間に電子管が発達して,暗夜を通して物をみるレーダー,或は今後の戦争に人類を破械に導くかと恐れられている原子分裂等応用の面に於て恐るべき進歩をみせたのであるが,電気磁気学そのものも僅かではあるが変化がみられる。一つはMKS単位の採用である。これば可成り普及したと思はれる。次はヂメンシヨンの問題である。電気量QをM, L, T, と同じ資格を与えM, L, T, Qをもってすべての電気磁気的量を表はせば合理的なヂメンシヨン式がえられる。これはまだ普及されていないが,今後は当然これに統一すべきである。ところで私がかねてから不満に思うて居るのは磁気学の構成である。多くの書物を見ても満足すべきものがなく,又これを訂正しようとする提案も見かけないので,磁気学の左の点に疑義があるか,これをどのように訂正すべきかについて私見を述べる。", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_3_description_40": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ(DSpace)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Article", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_6": {"attribute_name": "引用", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "富山大学工学部紀要, 4(1/2), Page 1-8", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "53415", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "MORI, Mituzo"}]}]}, "item_3_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15099/00003491", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_3_publisher_33": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "富山大学工学部"}]}, "item_3_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00175872", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_3_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "03871339", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_3_subject_22": {"attribute_name": "国立国会図書館分類", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "ZM2", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDLC"}]}, "item_3_version_type_16": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "森, 光三"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "53414", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2016-02-16"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "Kokiyo_4_01_Page001to008.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "3.2 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 3200000.0, "url": {"label": "Kokiyo_4_01_Page001to008.pdf", "url": "https://toyama.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/3497/files/Kokiyo_4_01_Page001to008.pdf"}, "version_id": "c15aeb67-2d15-4e45-957e-ce311d2fabff"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "磁気学", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "磁極", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "磁石板", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "磁気感応", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "アンペア法則", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "磁気学についての二三の疑義", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "磁気学についての二三の疑義"}]}, "item_type_id": "3", "owner": "3", "path": ["564"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15099/00003491", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2012-08-07"}, "publish_date": "2012-08-07", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "3497", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["磁気学についての二三の疑義"], "weko_shared_id": 3}
磁気学についての二三の疑義
https://doi.org/10.15099/00003491
https://doi.org/10.15099/0000349196ad4d51-eab1-46c3-952f-16d002a2d317
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
Kokiyo_4_01_Page001to008.pdf (3.2 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2012-08-07 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 磁気学についての二三の疑義 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 磁気学 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 磁極 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 磁石板 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 磁気感応 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | アンペア法則 | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15099/00003491 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
森, 光三
× 森, 光三 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
姓名 | MORI, Mituzo | |||||
その他(別言語等)のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | On Some Doubts of the Fundamental of Magnetism | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | There were a few change in the lecture of the fundamental of electricity and magnetism. It was the adoption of the MKS rational system for the units of the electric and magnetic quantities, and of the charge of electricity Q as a dimension for them. I have had a dissatisfaction in the fundamental of the theory of magnetism for long time. But no improvements were not seen in this field. My opinion is as follows. The idea of magnetic charge must be used carefully as the magnetic charge is apparent and not being as the electric charge. There are mistakes in the calculation of the magnetic potential differences of two points near the surface of a magnetic shell, one is at positive side and the another at negative side, in usual text books. My definition of magnetic induction and magnetic force is stated. The Ampere's law is experimental and can not be proved theoretically. |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | 私が初めて電気磁気学を学んでから既に三十余年,この間に電子管が発達して,暗夜を通して物をみるレーダー,或は今後の戦争に人類を破械に導くかと恐れられている原子分裂等応用の面に於て恐るべき進歩をみせたのであるが,電気磁気学そのものも僅かではあるが変化がみられる。一つはMKS単位の採用である。これば可成り普及したと思はれる。次はヂメンシヨンの問題である。電気量QをM, L, T, と同じ資格を与えM, L, T, Qをもってすべての電気磁気的量を表はせば合理的なヂメンシヨン式がえられる。これはまだ普及されていないが,今後は当然これに統一すべきである。ところで私がかねてから不満に思うて居るのは磁気学の構成である。多くの書物を見ても満足すべきものがなく,又これを訂正しようとする提案も見かけないので,磁気学の左の点に疑義があるか,これをどのように訂正すべきかについて私見を述べる。 | |||||
引用 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 富山大学工学部紀要, 4(1/2), Page 1-8 | |||||
書誌情報 |
富山大学工学部紀要 巻 4, 号 1/2, p. 1-8, 発行日 1953-03-05 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 03871339 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00175872 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
国立国会図書館分類 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDLC | |||||
主題 | ZM2 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 富山大学工学部 | |||||
資源タイプ(DSpace) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Article |